BibTex RIS Cite

KAMU-ÖZEL ORTAKLIKLARININ BİR YÖNETİŞİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK YAYGINLAŞMASI: KURUMSALCI BİR YAKLAŞIM

Year 2005, Volume: 8 Issue: 1-2, 311 - 336, 06.05.2014

Abstract

Bu makale, kamu-özel ortaklıklarını (KÖO) bir yönetsel/yapısal yenilik olarak nitelemekte ve bu yeniliğin ABD'de kentsel ve bölgesel gelişme alanındaki yayılıp-yaygınlaşmasını incelemektedir. Çalışmada ilk olarak, KÖO'nın yaygın kullanımı hususunda özet bazı bilgiler verilmektedir. Ardından, kurumsalcı yaklaşımlara dair literatür gözden geçirilmekte ve kurumsalcı kuramlardan türetilen bir çerçevenin KÖO'nın Amerikan şehirlerinde yayılıp-yaygınlaşmasının gerisindeki nedenleri yakalama hususunda nasıl uygun düştüğü ve işe yaradığı tartışılmaktadır. Yazı, kısa bir değerlendirme ile sona ermektedir.

References

  • Barbour, George P., “Portland, Oregon: A balance of interest in public- private cooperation”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public—private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 210-241.
  • Bendick, Marc, Jr., “Privatization of public services: Recent experience", in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.)ı Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 153-171.
  • Bendick, Marc Jr., & Rasmussen, David W., “Enterprise zones and inner city economic revitalization", in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 97—129. 33]
  • Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergı'si/ Muhittin ACAR & Hüsey/h ÖZGÜR
  • Brandl, John, & Brooks Ronnie, “Public-private cooperation for urban revitalization: The Minneapolis and Saint Paul experience”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 163—199.
  • Brooks, Harvey, “Seeking equity and efŞciency: Public and private roles”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 3-29.
  • Colman, William G., State and local government and public- private partnerships—A policy issue handbook, New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.
  • Committee for Economic Development, (CED), Public-private partnerships—An opportunity for urban communities, New York, 1982.
  • Cummings, Scott, Koebel, C. Theodore, & Whitt, J. Allen, “Public-private partnerships and public enterprise”, Urban Resources, 1988, 5, 35—36, 47-48.
  • Davis, Perry, “Why partnerships now?”, National Civic Review, 1987, 32-33.
  • De Neufville, Judith I & Barton, Stephen E., “Myths and the deŞnition of policy problems—An exploration of home ownership and public—private partnerships”, Policy Sciences, 1987, 20, 181- 206.
  • DiMaggio, Paul J., & Powell, Walter W., “Introduction”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 1—38. '
  • DiMaggio, Paul, J. & Powell, Walter, W. “The iron cage revisited:
  • ' Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in
  • organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 1983, 48 (April),147—160.
  • The Diffusion Of Public-Private Partnerships As A New Farm Of Ga vernance: An Institutional Perspective I
  • business enterprise’, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, &
  • Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—
  • New opportunities for meeting social needs,
  • Cambridge, MA: Baliinger Publishing Company, 1984, 285- 302.
  • Du Pont, Pierre S., “State government and community partnerships", Journal ofCommunityActian, 1982, 1 (4) 15-16.
  • Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A., “Public-private partnership: An overview”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 1-15.
  • Fox, Siegrun F. “Who opposes public/private Şnancial partnerships for urban renewal? A case study”, Journal of Urban AŞ'airs, Winter 1985, 7 (1) 27—40.
  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph, “Making corporate actors accountable: Institution- building in Minneapolis-St. Paul”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 293-310.
  • Gunyou, John, “Financial analysis for public-private partnerships”, in Weiss, Barbara (ed.), Public-private partnerships— Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C., 1985, 3-35.
  • Guskind, Robert, “The giveaway game continues”, Planning, February 1990, 4-8.
  • Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Working partners 1984— Reports of successful local community development public/private partnerships, Washington, D. C: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1984.
  • Sosyal Bli/m/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
  • Jepperson, Ronald L., “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 143— 163. '
  • Judd, Dennis R. & Ready, Randy L., “Entrepreneurial cities and the new politics of economic development”, in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 209-247.
  • Knoke, David, “The Spread of municipal reform: temporal, spatial, and social dynamics”, American Journal of Sociology, 1982, (87) 1314-1339
  • Langton, Stuart, “Public-private partnerships: Hope or Hoax?”, National Civic Review, May 1983, 256-261.
  • Levine, Marc V., “The politics of partnership: Urban development since 1945", in Squires, Gregory D. (ed.), Unequal partnerships— The political economy of urban redevelopment in Postwar America, New York: Rutgers University Press, 1989, * 12-34.
  • Lewis, Norman, Inner city regeneration: The demise of regional and local government, Open University Press, 1992.
  • Lyall, Katharine, “A bycle built—for—two: Public-private partnership in Bal— timore”, National Civic Review, November 1983, 531—571.
  • Meyer, John W., Scott, W. Richard, & Deal, Terrence, E. “Institutional and technical resources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations", in John W. Meyer, & W. Richard Scott (eds.) Organizational environments, 1983, Beverly‘Hills: Sage, 45—67.
  • Meyer, John W. & Rowan, Brian, “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83 (2) 340-362.
  • The D/Ş'usion Of Pub/ic—Private Pa/tnersh/ps As A New Form Of Governance: An Inst/tuŞona/ Perspective
  • Moore, Chris, Richardson, J. J., & Moon, Jeremy, “New partnerships in local economic development—A case -study of local entrepreneurship”, Local Government Studies, September/October 1985, 19-33.
  • Norris, William J., “A new role for corporations”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public- private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 243-262.
  • Oliver, Christine, “Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy ofManagementReview, 1991,16 (1) 145-179.
  • Petersen, “Introduction” in Weiss, Barbara (ed.) Public-private partnerships—Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C. 1985, ix—xii.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, “A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations", in Mark S. Mizruchi and Michael Schwartz (eds.), Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, New York: Cambridge UP, 1987, pp. 25-55.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, & Salancik, Gerald, R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
  • Ritti, R. Richard, & Silver, Jonathan H. “Early processes of institutionalization: The dramaturgy of exchange in interorganizational relations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 25—42.
  • Scott, W. Richard, “The adolescence of institutional theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 493—511. '
  • StanŞeld, Rochelle L. “Reagan urban policy—Count us out of public- private partnerships”, National Journal, 7/3/1982, 1172— , 1175.
  • Sosya/ Bilim/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Derg/si/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
  • Stephenson, Max 0. Jr., “Whither the public—private partnership—A critical overview”, Urban Affairs Quarterly, September 1991, 109-127. '
  • Suchman, Mark, C. “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, (3) 571-610.
  • Sweat, Dan E., & Anthony, Jacquelyn A., “The role of corporations in urban revitalization—The experience of the Atlanta Project”, National Civic Review, Summer-Fall 1995, 239-247.
  • Tolbert, Pamela S., & Zucker, Lynne G., “Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935", Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 22—39.
Year 2005, Volume: 8 Issue: 1-2, 311 - 336, 06.05.2014

Abstract

References

  • Barbour, George P., “Portland, Oregon: A balance of interest in public- private cooperation”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public—private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 210-241.
  • Bendick, Marc, Jr., “Privatization of public services: Recent experience", in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.)ı Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 153-171.
  • Bendick, Marc Jr., & Rasmussen, David W., “Enterprise zones and inner city economic revitalization", in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 97—129. 33]
  • Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergı'si/ Muhittin ACAR & Hüsey/h ÖZGÜR
  • Brandl, John, & Brooks Ronnie, “Public-private cooperation for urban revitalization: The Minneapolis and Saint Paul experience”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 163—199.
  • Brooks, Harvey, “Seeking equity and efŞciency: Public and private roles”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 3-29.
  • Colman, William G., State and local government and public- private partnerships—A policy issue handbook, New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.
  • Committee for Economic Development, (CED), Public-private partnerships—An opportunity for urban communities, New York, 1982.
  • Cummings, Scott, Koebel, C. Theodore, & Whitt, J. Allen, “Public-private partnerships and public enterprise”, Urban Resources, 1988, 5, 35—36, 47-48.
  • Davis, Perry, “Why partnerships now?”, National Civic Review, 1987, 32-33.
  • De Neufville, Judith I & Barton, Stephen E., “Myths and the deŞnition of policy problems—An exploration of home ownership and public—private partnerships”, Policy Sciences, 1987, 20, 181- 206.
  • DiMaggio, Paul J., & Powell, Walter W., “Introduction”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 1—38. '
  • DiMaggio, Paul, J. & Powell, Walter, W. “The iron cage revisited:
  • ' Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in
  • organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 1983, 48 (April),147—160.
  • The Diffusion Of Public-Private Partnerships As A New Farm Of Ga vernance: An Institutional Perspective I
  • business enterprise’, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, &
  • Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—
  • New opportunities for meeting social needs,
  • Cambridge, MA: Baliinger Publishing Company, 1984, 285- 302.
  • Du Pont, Pierre S., “State government and community partnerships", Journal ofCommunityActian, 1982, 1 (4) 15-16.
  • Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A., “Public-private partnership: An overview”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 1-15.
  • Fox, Siegrun F. “Who opposes public/private Şnancial partnerships for urban renewal? A case study”, Journal of Urban AŞ'airs, Winter 1985, 7 (1) 27—40.
  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph, “Making corporate actors accountable: Institution- building in Minneapolis-St. Paul”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 293-310.
  • Gunyou, John, “Financial analysis for public-private partnerships”, in Weiss, Barbara (ed.), Public-private partnerships— Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C., 1985, 3-35.
  • Guskind, Robert, “The giveaway game continues”, Planning, February 1990, 4-8.
  • Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Working partners 1984— Reports of successful local community development public/private partnerships, Washington, D. C: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1984.
  • Sosyal Bli/m/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
  • Jepperson, Ronald L., “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 143— 163. '
  • Judd, Dennis R. & Ready, Randy L., “Entrepreneurial cities and the new politics of economic development”, in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 209-247.
  • Knoke, David, “The Spread of municipal reform: temporal, spatial, and social dynamics”, American Journal of Sociology, 1982, (87) 1314-1339
  • Langton, Stuart, “Public-private partnerships: Hope or Hoax?”, National Civic Review, May 1983, 256-261.
  • Levine, Marc V., “The politics of partnership: Urban development since 1945", in Squires, Gregory D. (ed.), Unequal partnerships— The political economy of urban redevelopment in Postwar America, New York: Rutgers University Press, 1989, * 12-34.
  • Lewis, Norman, Inner city regeneration: The demise of regional and local government, Open University Press, 1992.
  • Lyall, Katharine, “A bycle built—for—two: Public-private partnership in Bal— timore”, National Civic Review, November 1983, 531—571.
  • Meyer, John W., Scott, W. Richard, & Deal, Terrence, E. “Institutional and technical resources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations", in John W. Meyer, & W. Richard Scott (eds.) Organizational environments, 1983, Beverly‘Hills: Sage, 45—67.
  • Meyer, John W. & Rowan, Brian, “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83 (2) 340-362.
  • The D/Ş'usion Of Pub/ic—Private Pa/tnersh/ps As A New Form Of Governance: An Inst/tuŞona/ Perspective
  • Moore, Chris, Richardson, J. J., & Moon, Jeremy, “New partnerships in local economic development—A case -study of local entrepreneurship”, Local Government Studies, September/October 1985, 19-33.
  • Norris, William J., “A new role for corporations”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public- private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 243-262.
  • Oliver, Christine, “Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy ofManagementReview, 1991,16 (1) 145-179.
  • Petersen, “Introduction” in Weiss, Barbara (ed.) Public-private partnerships—Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C. 1985, ix—xii.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, “A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations", in Mark S. Mizruchi and Michael Schwartz (eds.), Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, New York: Cambridge UP, 1987, pp. 25-55.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, & Salancik, Gerald, R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
  • Ritti, R. Richard, & Silver, Jonathan H. “Early processes of institutionalization: The dramaturgy of exchange in interorganizational relations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 25—42.
  • Scott, W. Richard, “The adolescence of institutional theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 493—511. '
  • StanŞeld, Rochelle L. “Reagan urban policy—Count us out of public- private partnerships”, National Journal, 7/3/1982, 1172— , 1175.
  • Sosya/ Bilim/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Derg/si/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
  • Stephenson, Max 0. Jr., “Whither the public—private partnership—A critical overview”, Urban Affairs Quarterly, September 1991, 109-127. '
  • Suchman, Mark, C. “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, (3) 571-610.
  • Sweat, Dan E., & Anthony, Jacquelyn A., “The role of corporations in urban revitalization—The experience of the Atlanta Project”, National Civic Review, Summer-Fall 1995, 239-247.
  • Tolbert, Pamela S., & Zucker, Lynne G., “Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935", Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 22—39.
There are 52 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Muhittin Acar This is me

Hüseyin Özgür

Publication Date May 6, 2014
Submission Date December 31, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 8 Issue: 1-2

Cite

APA Acar, M., & Özgür, H. (2014). KAMU-ÖZEL ORTAKLIKLARININ BİR YÖNETİŞİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK YAYGINLAŞMASI: KURUMSALCI BİR YAKLAŞIM. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 8(1-2), 311-336.

Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).