BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 107 - 112, 24.09.2012

Öz

Abstract

A comparative study of taxonomic species diversity (TAX) indices with traditional species diversity (TRAD) indices was made from 11 sampling points in the Yazılı Canyon Nature Park of the Sütçüler district, Isparta. Five TRAD indices (i.e. Shannon-Wienner ( ), Simpson , Fisher alpha (a), Margalef (d) indices and species richness (S)) and five TAX (i.e. Taxonomic Diversity ( ), Taxonomic Distinctness ( ), Average Taxonomic Distinctness ( ), Variation in Taxonomic Distinctness ( ) and Total Taxonomic Distinctness ( )) indices were calculated for each of all sampling points. Simple correlation analyses were applied to examine the relationships among the indices. As a result, traditional diversity indices were higher correlated with each other compared to the relationships among taxonomic indices. Principle component analysis PCA were applied for not only each of the groups of the diversity indices but also for all of the indices. According to results of PCA, a kappa coefficient ( ) illustrating multicollinearity of TRAD indices was found 95.14 whereas this value was 34.63 for TAX indices. According the PCA results applied for all indices, two components (eigenvalue >1 and proportion of variance > 10%) were explained 94.62 % of total variance. All traditional diversity indices were only significantly correlated with the first axes. Regarding to taxonomic diversity indices, , and were correlated to both of the axes, whereas the significant correlations were found for with axes 1 and for with second axes. According to all results, taxonomic diversity indices describe a wider area compared to traditional diversity indices and, seems to be the best representative index for all diversity indices.

Keywords: Biodiversity, taxonomic diversity, species diversity, functional diversity, structural diversity

Kaynakça

  • Aurélio da Silva, I., Batalha, M.A., 2006. Taxonomic Distinctness and Diversity of a Hyperseasonal Savanna in Central Brazil. Diversity and Distribution, 12: 725-730.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 523–531.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 1999. The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 184:21– 29.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 216: 265–278.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Stephen, G.W., Aiken, L.S., 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Third Edition). Regression/Correlation with Two or More Independent Variables), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publisher, 703 s., Mahwah, New Jersey, USA. 3. Bölüm (Multiple
  • Desrochers, R., Anand, M., 2004. From Traditional Diversity Indices to Taxonomic Diversity Indices, International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Science 30: 85-92.
  • Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S., Williams, C.B., 1943. The relationships between the number of species and the number of Individuals in a random sample of an animal population, J. Anim. Ecol., 12:42-58.
  • Gwali, S., Okullo, P., Hafashimana, D., Byabashaija, D.M., 2010. Taxonomic Diversity, Distinctness, and Abundance of Tree and Shrup Species in Kasagala Forest Reserve in Uganda: Implications for Management and Conservation Policy Decisions, Tropical Conservation Science, 3.(3): 319-333.
  • Heip, C., Engels, P., 1974. Comparing Species Diversity and Evenness Indices, J. Mar. Biol. Ass., U.K., 54: 559-563.
  • Koperski, P., 2010. Diversity of Macrobenthos in Lowland Streams: Ecological Determinants and Taxonomic Specificity, J. Limmol, 69(1), 88-101.
  • Özdamar, K., 2004. Paket Programlar ile İstatiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler), Kaan Kitabevi, 502s. Eskişehir.
  • Özkan, K., 2010. Orman Ekosistem Çeşitliliği Haritalama Çalışmaları için Ekolojik Alan Çeşitliliğinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Öneri, SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, A(2):136- 148.
  • Salas, F., Patrício, J., Marcos, C., Pardal, M.A., Pérez-Ruzafa, A., Marques, J.C., 2006. Are Taxonomic Distinctness measures compliant to other ecological indicators in assessing ecological status?, Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 817–829.
  • Warwick, R.M., Clarke, K.R., 1995. New biodiversity measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 129, 301– 305.
  • Warwick, R.M., Clarke, K.R., 1998. Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 532–543.
  • Whittaker, R.H. 1973. Ordination and Clasification of Communities (Part V). Handbook of Vegetation Science, Editor in Chief: Reinhold Tüxen, Printed in The Netherlands by Dijkstra Niemeyer b. v., Groningel.
  • You-Hua, C., Zhi-Bo, W., 2009. Relationship between Taxonomic Distinctness and Environmental Stress in Terrestrial Organisms at Large Spatial Scale: A Study for Insect family Ceratopogonidae in East Asia. Acta zool. bulg., 61(1): 69-77.

Taksonomik çeşitlilik indislerlerinin geleneksel çeşitlilik indisleri ile karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 107 - 112, 24.09.2012

Öz

Özet

Bu çalışmada Isparta-Sütçüler yöresi'nde bulunan Yazılı Kanyon Tabiat parkı'ndan alınan 11 örnek alan verisi kullanarak taksonomik tür çeşitlilik (TAÇ) indisleri ile geleneksel tür çeşitlilik (GEÇ) indislerinin hesaplanması ve karşılaştırılması amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Her önek alan için beş GEÇ (Shannon-Wienner ( ), Simpson , Fisher alfa (a), Margalef (d) indisleri ve tür zenginliği (S)) ve beş TAÇ (taksonomik çeşitlilik ( ), taksonomik mesafe ( ), ortalama taksonomik mesafe ( ),taksonomik mesafe içindeki varyasyon ( ),toplam taksonomik mesafe ( )) indisi hesaplanmıştır. İndislerinin birbiri ile ilişkilerini belirlemek için korelasyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, GEÇ indislerinin TAÇ indisleri ile karşılaştırıldığında birbirleri ile çok daha yüksek ilişkiler gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada ayrıca her çeşitlilik indisi grubu için ve bütün çeşitlilik indisleri için temel bileşenler analizi (TBA) uygulanmıştır. TBA sonuçlarına göre, GEÇ indislerinin veride çoklu bağlantı değerini gösteren kappa katsayısı 95,14 olarak bulunurken bu değer TAÇ indisleri için 34,63 değerinde kalmıştır. Bütün indislerin dahil edildiği TBA sonuçlarına göre, özdeğeri 1'den ve varyansa katılma oranı %10 dan büyük olan iki bileşen tespit edilmiş oluo bu bileşenlerin toplam varyans içindeki oranı % 94.62 olarak bulunmuştur. Burada bütün geleneksel çeşitlilik indisleri sadece bileşen 1 ile önemli ilişki göstermiştir. Taksonomik çeşitlilik indislerine gelindiğinde; , ve her iki eksenle yüksek korelasyon gösterirken sadece bileşen 1 ile ve ise bileşen 2 ile ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuçların genel değerlendirmesine göre, taksonomik çeşitlilik indisleri geleneksel çeşitlilik indisleri ile karşılaştırıldığında daha geniş bir aralığı tanımlamaktadır ve bütün indisleri en iyi temsil eden indis olarak görülmektedir.

Anahtar kelimeler: Biyoçeşitlilik, taksonomik çeşitlilik, tür çeşitliliği, fonksiyonel çeşitlilik, yapısal çeşitlilik

Kaynakça

  • Aurélio da Silva, I., Batalha, M.A., 2006. Taxonomic Distinctness and Diversity of a Hyperseasonal Savanna in Central Brazil. Diversity and Distribution, 12: 725-730.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 523–531.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 1999. The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 184:21– 29.
  • Clarke, K.R., Warwick, R.M., 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 216: 265–278.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Stephen, G.W., Aiken, L.S., 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Third Edition). Regression/Correlation with Two or More Independent Variables), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publisher, 703 s., Mahwah, New Jersey, USA. 3. Bölüm (Multiple
  • Desrochers, R., Anand, M., 2004. From Traditional Diversity Indices to Taxonomic Diversity Indices, International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Science 30: 85-92.
  • Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S., Williams, C.B., 1943. The relationships between the number of species and the number of Individuals in a random sample of an animal population, J. Anim. Ecol., 12:42-58.
  • Gwali, S., Okullo, P., Hafashimana, D., Byabashaija, D.M., 2010. Taxonomic Diversity, Distinctness, and Abundance of Tree and Shrup Species in Kasagala Forest Reserve in Uganda: Implications for Management and Conservation Policy Decisions, Tropical Conservation Science, 3.(3): 319-333.
  • Heip, C., Engels, P., 1974. Comparing Species Diversity and Evenness Indices, J. Mar. Biol. Ass., U.K., 54: 559-563.
  • Koperski, P., 2010. Diversity of Macrobenthos in Lowland Streams: Ecological Determinants and Taxonomic Specificity, J. Limmol, 69(1), 88-101.
  • Özdamar, K., 2004. Paket Programlar ile İstatiksel Veri Analizi (Çok Değişkenli Analizler), Kaan Kitabevi, 502s. Eskişehir.
  • Özkan, K., 2010. Orman Ekosistem Çeşitliliği Haritalama Çalışmaları için Ekolojik Alan Çeşitliliğinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Öneri, SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, A(2):136- 148.
  • Salas, F., Patrício, J., Marcos, C., Pardal, M.A., Pérez-Ruzafa, A., Marques, J.C., 2006. Are Taxonomic Distinctness measures compliant to other ecological indicators in assessing ecological status?, Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 817–829.
  • Warwick, R.M., Clarke, K.R., 1995. New biodiversity measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 129, 301– 305.
  • Warwick, R.M., Clarke, K.R., 1998. Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35: 532–543.
  • Whittaker, R.H. 1973. Ordination and Clasification of Communities (Part V). Handbook of Vegetation Science, Editor in Chief: Reinhold Tüxen, Printed in The Netherlands by Dijkstra Niemeyer b. v., Groningel.
  • You-Hua, C., Zhi-Bo, W., 2009. Relationship between Taxonomic Distinctness and Environmental Stress in Terrestrial Organisms at Large Spatial Scale: A Study for Insect family Ceratopogonidae in East Asia. Acta zool. bulg., 61(1): 69-77.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Orijinal Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Kürşad Özkan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Eylül 2012
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2012 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Özkan, K. (2012). Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 13(2), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.63949
AMA Özkan K. Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices. Turkish Journal of Forestry. Eylül 2012;13(2):107-112. doi:10.18182/tjf.63949
Chicago Özkan, Kürşad. “Comparison of Taxonomic Diversity Indices With Traditional Diversity Indices”. Turkish Journal of Forestry 13, sy. 2 (Eylül 2012): 107-12. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.63949.
EndNote Özkan K (01 Eylül 2012) Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices. Turkish Journal of Forestry 13 2 107–112.
IEEE K. Özkan, “Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices”, Turkish Journal of Forestry, c. 13, sy. 2, ss. 107–112, 2012, doi: 10.18182/tjf.63949.
ISNAD Özkan, Kürşad. “Comparison of Taxonomic Diversity Indices With Traditional Diversity Indices”. Turkish Journal of Forestry 13/2 (Eylül 2012), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.63949.
JAMA Özkan K. Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices. Turkish Journal of Forestry. 2012;13:107–112.
MLA Özkan, Kürşad. “Comparison of Taxonomic Diversity Indices With Traditional Diversity Indices”. Turkish Journal of Forestry, c. 13, sy. 2, 2012, ss. 107-12, doi:10.18182/tjf.63949.
Vancouver Özkan K. Comparison of taxonomic diversity indices with traditional diversity indices. Turkish Journal of Forestry. 2012;13(2):107-12.